<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review Scoring, Formatting and MAL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/</link>
	<description>My opinions, let me tell them to you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:52:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinion Prone :: Review :: Review: Antique Bakery</title>
		<link>http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinion Prone :: Review :: Review: Antique Bakery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/17/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/#comment-407</guid>
		<description>[...] is my first review on MAL since its review overhaul though, and I must say, I really, really miss that BBCode. I am still using my old review template, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is my first review on MAL since its review overhaul though, and I must say, I really, really miss that BBCode. I am still using my old review template, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiriska</title>
		<link>http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiriska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/17/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;d be curious to know how it&#039;s a security issue, but if that were the case, I don&#039;t see why Xinil couldn&#039;t have just mentioned it. From his words, it seems more like a personal vendetta against BBCode, which really just makes him out to be a selfish administrator who makes adjustments without considering the other users on the site. I don&#039;t know whether or not that&#039;s actually true, but that&#039;s the impression I&#039;m getting from his explanations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;d be curious to know how it&#8217;s a security issue, but if that were the case, I don&#8217;t see why Xinil couldn&#8217;t have just mentioned it. From his words, it seems more like a personal vendetta against BBCode, which really just makes him out to be a selfish administrator who makes adjustments without considering the other users on the site. I don&#8217;t know whether or not that&#8217;s actually true, but that&#8217;s the impression I&#8217;m getting from his explanations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan A</title>
		<link>http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/17/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I&#039;m still set against bringing bbcode back. Newspapers, magazines, news websites...none of them use bold/italics. We don&#039;t need it.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s really not about that... it&#039;s a security thing. It&#039;s also not about needing it, because it is available and why not allow it... personally, on the site I&#039;ve been developing (melative.com) the objective is to not limit possibilities or confinements.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Unfortunately, I don&#039;t do on-site reviews, but link to reviews via associated bookmarking... also, there are no point-ratings... can&#039;t recommend it :( I&#039;m sure there are ways to make relative ratings work with review-breakdowns, but I&#039;ll leave that for when it is needed.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I&#8217;m still set against bringing bbcode back. Newspapers, magazines, news websites&#8230;none of them use bold/italics. We don&#8217;t need it.</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s really not about that&#8230; it&#8217;s a security thing. It&#8217;s also not about needing it, because it is available and why not allow it&#8230; personally, on the site I&#8217;ve been developing (melative.com) the objective is to not limit possibilities or confinements.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t do on-site reviews, but link to reviews via associated bookmarking&#8230; also, there are no point-ratings&#8230; can&#8217;t recommend it :( I&#8217;m sure there are ways to make relative ratings work with review-breakdowns, but I&#8217;ll leave that for when it is needed.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiriska</title>
		<link>http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiriska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/17/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>@Joe: Yeah, I find that a lot of NYT&#039;s book and movie reviews are pretty unclear as to what position the author&#039;s taking, perhaps to keep offending the reader to a minimal. That&#039;s all well and good, but if I can&#039;t take away some kind of impression, then that&#039;s missing the point. I seem to recall the book review for Harry Potter 7 being vague like that, though the review for The Dark Knight was definitely positive. Maybe a number is oversimplifying a very complex opinion, but you can&#039;t argue with its ease of understanding.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;@Iknight: Certainly its Xinil&#039;s site, but I always like to think that administrators should keep nice with their members. I don&#039;t see the point in needlessly initiating antagonisms by implementing changes without polling the public. The changes made to the review system seemed more like a random whim of his because there was no public call for it, and his refusal to compromise (at least with the BBCode matter) with the resulting backlash just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It reminds me a bit of Facebook. Sure, MAL isn&#039;t anywhere near Facebook&#039;s caliber and its members aren&#039;t as vocal, but it&#039;s the same kind of idea. Like I said, &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I like Mal a lot -- it&#039;s an incredibly useful tool, and for the most part, I enjoy the community. I&#039;m with you in that I&#039;ll leave if something utterly offensive happens (and it hasn&#039;t yet), but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s too much to ask for Xinil to consult the masses a bit before implementing large changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe: Yeah, I find that a lot of NYT&#8217;s book and movie reviews are pretty unclear as to what position the author&#8217;s taking, perhaps to keep offending the reader to a minimal. That&#8217;s all well and good, but if I can&#8217;t take away some kind of impression, then that&#8217;s missing the point. I seem to recall the book review for Harry Potter 7 being vague like that, though the review for The Dark Knight was definitely positive. Maybe a number is oversimplifying a very complex opinion, but you can&#8217;t argue with its ease of understanding.</p>
<p>@Iknight: Certainly its Xinil&#8217;s site, but I always like to think that administrators should keep nice with their members. I don&#8217;t see the point in needlessly initiating antagonisms by implementing changes without polling the public. The changes made to the review system seemed more like a random whim of his because there was no public call for it, and his refusal to compromise (at least with the BBCode matter) with the resulting backlash just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It reminds me a bit of Facebook. Sure, MAL isn&#8217;t anywhere near Facebook&#8217;s caliber and its members aren&#8217;t as vocal, but it&#8217;s the same kind of idea. Like I said, </p>
<p>I like Mal a lot &#8212; it&#8217;s an incredibly useful tool, and for the most part, I enjoy the community. I&#8217;m with you in that I&#8217;ll leave if something utterly offensive happens (and it hasn&#8217;t yet), but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s too much to ask for Xinil to consult the masses a bit before implementing large changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iknight</title>
		<link>http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Iknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/17/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/#comment-232</guid>
		<description>It feels pretty weird not being able to italicise series titles. But hey, it&#039;s Xinil&#039;s website. I guess I&#039;ll leave it if he ever makes changes which are too irritating (these don&#039;t fall into that category).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You can actually get a review removed if it contains major spoilers. I suspect they have to be obvious, serious ones that the mods will recognise, though: the case I&#039;m thinking of is a review of &lt;em&gt;Magikano&lt;/em&gt; which said (essentially) &#039;Don&#039;t watch this because at the end [etc]&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It feels pretty weird not being able to italicise series titles. But hey, it&#8217;s Xinil&#8217;s website. I guess I&#8217;ll leave it if he ever makes changes which are too irritating (these don&#8217;t fall into that category).</p>
<p>You can actually get a review removed if it contains major spoilers. I suspect they have to be obvious, serious ones that the mods will recognise, though: the case I&#8217;m thinking of is a review of <em>Magikano</em> which said (essentially) &#8216;Don&#8217;t watch this because at the end [etc]&#8216;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://op.deadend-detour.com/2009/03/17/review-scoring-formatting-and-mal/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>The New York Times, and many other book reviewers don&#039;t use scores at all. I appreciate this, but at the same time It&#039;s sometimes difficult to determine if they liked or disliked a book if you don&#039;t have encyclopedic knowledge of the literary world; you&#039;re just left with a general feeling. They also very rarely summarize their opinion. I hate having to stuff a novel or something into a simplistic grading system but it seems necessary to get the idea across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times, and many other book reviewers don&#8217;t use scores at all. I appreciate this, but at the same time It&#8217;s sometimes difficult to determine if they liked or disliked a book if you don&#8217;t have encyclopedic knowledge of the literary world; you&#8217;re just left with a general feeling. They also very rarely summarize their opinion. I hate having to stuff a novel or something into a simplistic grading system but it seems necessary to get the idea across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
